HOLLAND v. CITY OF CANNON BEACH

95-049; CA A90660.

920 P.2d 562 (1996)

142 Or. App. 5

David HOLLAND, Petitioner, v. CITY OF CANNON BEACH, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 3, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William C. Cox, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief, for petitioner.

Daniel H. Kearns, Portland, argued the cause, for respondent. With him on the brief was Preston Gates & Ellis.

Before DEITS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and HASELTON, JJ.


DEITS, Presiding Judge.

In this case which is before us on remand from the Supreme Court, Holland v. City of Cannon Beach, 323 Or. 148, 915 P.2d 407 (1996), petitioner seeks review of LUBA's decision affirming the city's denial of his application for a subdivision. In our earlier opinion, 138 Or.App. 340, 908 P.2d 838 (1995...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases