1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 83 F.3d
  5. 83 F.3d 1399 (1996)
 

SCHENDEL v. CURTIS

No. 95-1329.

83 F.3d 1399 (1996)

Paul SCHENDEL, Appellant, v. Benson M. CURTIS, Linda S. Park, and David J. Cosman, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 14, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce M. Collins, Mathews, Woodbridge & Collins, Princeton, New Jersey, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Scott N. Bernstein.

John P. Isacson, Jr., Foley & Lardner, Washington, D.C., argued for appellees. With him on the brief were Stephen A. Bent and Lawrence M. Sung.

Before NEWMAN, LOURIE, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by the court filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Paul Schendel appeals from the April 19, 1995 decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences ("board" or "PTO") granting summary judgment in favor of Benson M. Curtis, Linda S. Park, and David J. Cosman (collectively "Curtis") in Interference No. 103,443. Because the board did not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases