1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 96 F.3d
  5. 96 F.3d 1377 (1996)
 

SPRAYTEX, INC. v. DJS&T

No. 96-1172.

96 F.3d 1377 (1996)

SPRAYTEX, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DJS&T and Homax Corporation, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

September 23, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard H. Zaitlen, Loeb & Loeb, LLP, Los Angeles, California, submitted the motion to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction, for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the motion were David L. Lubitz and David Victor.

Paul L. Gardner, Christensen, O'Connor, Johnson & Kindness, PLLC, Seattle, Washington, submitted the appellants' response in opposition to appellee's motion to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction for defendants-appellants.

Before RICH, LOURIE, and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Spraytex, Inc. moves to dismiss DJS&T and Homax Corporation's (Homax) appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Homax opposes.

BACKGROUND

In March 1995, Spraytex filed an action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California seeking a declaratory judgment of noninfringement of Homax's United States Patent 4,310,095 (the '095 patent).1 Homax counterclaimed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases