STATE EX REL. YAUGER v. SEIDNER

Nos. 96-1009, 96-1010, 96-1263, 96-1273, 96-1300, 96-1311 and 96-1351.

77 Ohio St.3d 69 (1996)

THE STATE EX REL. YAUGER, APPELLANT, v. SEIDNER, WARDEN, APPELLEE. (TWO CASES.) THE STATE EX REL. KIMBRO, APPELLANT, v. SEIDNER, WARDEN, APPELLEE. THE STATE EX REL. MCCLUTCHEN, APPELLANT, v. SEIDNER, WARDEN, APPELLEE. THE STATE EX REL. WHITE, APPELLANT, v. SEIDNER, WARDEN, APPELLEE. THE STATE EX REL. GARCIA, APPELLANT, v. SEIDNER, WARDEN, APPELLEE. THE STATE EX REL. DIX, APPELLANT, v. SEIDNER, WARDEN, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 6, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ricky Yauger, pro se.

Nathaniel Kimbro, pro se.

Phillip McClutchen, pro se.

David J. White, pro se.

Modesto Garcia, pro se.

Richard Dix, Jr., pro se.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, Charles L. Wille, Karl R. Wetzel, Stuart A Cole and Donald Gary Keyser, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

Appellants assert in their propositions of law that the court of appeals erred in dismissing their habeas corpus petitions. Appellants claim that their indictments did not comply with R.C. 2941.03(D) because none of the charges alleged that the offenses were committed within the territorial jurisdictions of their sentencing courts. However, as we recently held in similar appeals instituted by inmates at the same prison, these claims merely attack...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases