ANDERSON v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT FOR ZONING

No. 94CA2209.

931 P.2d 517 (1996)

Donald E. ANDERSON and Marilee Anderson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR ZONING APPEALS, City and County of Denver; the City and County of Denver; Richard K. Kaufman; and M. Elaine Kaufman, Defendants-Appellees.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. V.

October 10, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gilbert Goldstein, Denver, Darrel L. Campbell, Englewood, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Daniel E. Muse, City Attorney, Thomas Bigler, John Stoffel, Assistant City Attorneys, Denver, for Defendants-Appellees Board of Adjustment for Zoning Appeals and the City and County of Denver.

Beimford & Gleason, P.C., Richard J. Gleason, Denver, for Defendants-Appellees Richard K. Kaufman and M. Elaine Kaufman.


Opinion by Chief Judge STERNBERG.

Plaintiffs, Donald and Mary Lee Anderson, appeal the order of the trial court upholding a decision of the defendant Board of Adjustment for Zoning Appeals of the City and County of Denver (the Board). That decision allowed defendants Richard and Emilene Kaufman to install an automated car wash on their non-conforming filling station property. Plaintiffs also appeal the trial court's order concluding that their declaratory judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases