1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 94 F.3d
  5. 94 F.3d 1325 (1996)
 

U.S. v. ROBINSON

Nos. 95-50577, 95-50580.

94 F.3d 1325 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sandra Patricia ROBINSON, aka: Sandra Robinson, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Warren GILES, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided September 4, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neison M. Marks, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, California; Philip Deitch, Los Angeles, California, for defendants-appellants.

Randall R. Lee, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Angeles, California, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: D.W. NELSON, T.G. NELSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

THOMAS, Circuit Judge:

Sandra Robinson and Warren Giles pled guilty to criminal charges filed as a result of a government counterfeit credit card sting operation. They claim on appeal that because the sting operation precluded the possibility of actual pecuniary loss, the court erred by enhancing their sentences under U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1 for the loss they hoped, expected and intended to cause. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases