1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 91 F.3d
  5. 91 F.3d 1326 (1996)
 

PISCIOTTA v. TELEDYNE INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 94-55862, CV-93-14-JNK.

91 F.3d 1326 (1996)

Jimmy PISCIOTTA; Robert Stevens; Larry Anderson; Walter Herbert; Harry Trout; James Horne, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TELEDYNE INDUSTRIES, INC.; and Teledyne, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 5, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dale A. Hilmen, San Diego, California, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Mark S. Pulliam and Kenneth M. Fitzgerald, Latham & Watkins, San Diego, California, for defendants-appellees.

Before: GOODWIN and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges, and WARE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants seek review of the district court's orders dismissing Appellants' seventh and eighth causes of action, granting summary judgment in favor of Teledyne Industries, Inc. And Teledyne, Inc. ("Teledyne") and denying Appellants' motion to amend their complaint to add a claim based on promissory estoppel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm the district court's orders.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases