1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 932 F.Supp.
  5. 932 F.Supp. 469 (1996)
 

CLOROX CO. v. STERLING WINTHROP, INC.

No. CV92-0386-R.

932 F.Supp. 469 (1996)

The CLOROX COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. STERLING WINTHROP, INC., and Reckitt & Colman, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

July 31, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kim J. Landsman, Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler, New York City, for Plaintiff.

Paul Curnin, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, New York City, for Defendants.

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER

REAL, District Judge.

Defendants STERLING WINTHROP, INC. (STERLING) and RECKITT & COLMAN, INC. (RECKITT), the owners of the LYSOL trademark, move for summary judgment of this 4 year old dispute with THE CLOROX COMPANY (CLOROX), the owner of the PINE-SOL mark, in which CLOROX claims an agreement with RECKITT over the use of the PINE-SOL mark is a violation of the antitrust laws (Section 1 & 2 Sherman Act) as a restraint on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases