1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 104 F.3d
  5. 104 F.3d 1296 (1996)
 

GAIA TECHNOLOGIES v. RECONVERSION TECHNOLOGIES

Nos. 95-1345, 95-1346 and 95-1347.

104 F.3d 1296 (1996)

GAIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RECONVERSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Reconversion Technologies of Texas, Inc., Progressive Capital Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and David Gordon, Ira Rimer, Joel Holt and Richard Clark, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

December 4, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Guy E. Matthews, Houston, Texas, submitted a petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc for plaintiff-appellee and also a response to corporate defendant-appellant's petition for rehearing. With him on the petition and the response was William P. Jensen. Of counsel on the petition and the response was Richard L. Stanley, Arnold, White & Durkee, Houston, Texas.

R. Thomas Seymour, Tulsa, Oklahoma, submitted a response for defendants-appellants David Gordon, Ira Rimer, Joel Holt and Richard Clark to the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc filed by plaintiff-appellee. With him on the response was C. Robert Burton, IV.

Michael Maness, Houston, Texas, submitted a petition for rehearing for defendants-appellants Reconversion Technologies, Inc., et al. and also a response to the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc filed by plaintiff-appellee. With him on the petition and the response was George D. Gordon, Baggett & Gordon, Conroe, Texas.

Before MICHEL, CLEVENGER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Reconversion Technologies, Inc., Reconversion Technologies of Texas, Inc., and Progressive Capital Corporation (collectively the Corporate Defendants) have petitioned for rehearing of this court's decision dated August 19, 1996. We grant the Corporate Defendants' petition for the limited purpose of amending our earlier opinion as follows:

1. Add the following text to the end of the penultimate paragraph on page 15 of the opinion (the paragraph...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases