FLINT ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Bobby WHITWORTH, Individually and in his official capacity as Department of Corrections Commissioner, Clyde Stovall, Individually and in his official capacity as Assistant Commissioner of Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellants,
Georgia Power Company, Defendant.
PATAULA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Bobby WHITWORTH, Individually and in his official capacity as Department of Corrections Commissioner, Clyde Stovall, Individually and in his official capacity as Assistant Commissioner of Department of Corrections, David C. Evans, Individually, Defendants-Appellants,
Georgia Power Company, Defendant.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 19, 1996.
March 19, 1996.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Michael J. Bowers, State Attorney General, Neal Bradley Childers, William F. Amideo, Atlanta, GA, for appellants in No. 94-9199.
James Allen Orr, Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, Dulaney L. O'Roark, III, Atlanta, GA, Kathy Renee Bess, FDIC, Legal Div., Atlanta, GA, for appellee in No. 94-9199.
Michael J. Bowers, State Attorney General, Daryl Alan Robinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Neal Bradley Childers, William F. Amideo, for appellants in No. 94-9227.
Robert P. Edwards, Jr., Kevin Charles Greene, Charles Frederick Palmer, Susan P. Wilkerson, Eric A. Szweda, Troutman Sanders, Atlanta, GA, for Georgia Power.
James Allen Orr, Dulaney L. O'Roark, III, Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, Atlanta, GA, James Elwood Friese, Office of James Elwood Friese, Cuthbert, GA, Kathy Renee Bess, FDIC, Legal Division, Atlanta, GA, for appellee in No. 94-9227.
Before BARKETT, Circuit Judge, and HENDERSON and CLARK, Senior Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
CORRECTED OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Our earlier opinion, reported at 68 F.3d 1309, is hereby modified by withdrawing the third sentence of the first full paragraph on page 1313, which states "It has also become evident, in light of McKinney, that the EMCs' procedural due process claims are not ripe for review[,]" and substituting in its place the following:
It has also become evident, in light of McKinney,<...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
