1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 76 F.3d
  5. 76 F.3d 1318 (1996)
 

U.S. v. GROSZ

No. 94-10922.

76 F.3d 1318 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph GROSZ, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

February 22, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elliot Samuels, Milner, Goranson, Sorrels, Udashen & Wells, Chicago, IL, George R. Milner, Milner, Goranson, Sorrels, Udashen & Wells, Dallas, TX, for appellant.

Elizabeth D. Collery, David Frank, Ellen Meltzer, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Crim. Div., Washington, DC, Paul E. Coggins, U.S. Atty., Dallas, TX, for appellee.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:

In this case, involving crimes of bank fraud, we primarily consider Joseph Grosz's contention that the district court violated the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161-3174, by allowing 354 non-excludable days to elapse between the final disposition of Grosz's interlocutory appeal and the filing of his motion to dismiss. The crucial question is whether the proceeding conducted four days before trial, relating to Grosz's pending motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases