1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 97 F.3d
  5. 97 F.3d 1296 (1996)
 

PEDRINA v. CHUN

Nos. 95-16477, 95-16782.

97 F.3d 1296 (1996)

Raymond PEDRINA, Luz Pedrina, Jupiterrex Uraniumrhi and Rosita Uraniumrhi, Plaintiffs, Leonard Wong and Cheryl Wong; Isidro Dilay; Margaret S. Dilay; Lorraine Dilay; Nicanor Amit; Alejandro Coloyan and Ofelia Coloyan; Raphael Kamai and Lynda Augustus; Alfredo Aurio, Sr. and Benita Aurio; Jennie Olinger; James Jones and Loretta Jones; Sebastian Igarta and Estrella Igarta; Wilfredo M. Bolo and Josefina V. Bolo; Cristita Bolo; Francisco Pedrina and Adoracion Pedrina; Frances C. Miguel; William Sullivan and Jocelyn Sullivan; Violeta Dumadag; John Batalona; Cipriano Manuel; Severo Duque; Milnor Lum; Peter Barcia and Julie Barcia, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Han Kuk CHUN; Tetsuo Yasuda; Y.Y. Valley Corporation, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, and Masanori Kobayashi; Yoshinori "Ken" Hayashida; City and County of Honolulu and Mayor Frank F. Fasi; Robert Carter; Eugene Lum and Norma Lum; Ernest Souza; Hiroshi Kobayashi, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided October 10, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony P. Locricchio, Kailua, Hawaii; David Behling, Kailua, Hawaii, for plaintiffs-appellants/cross-appellees.

Paul Alston and Mei Nakamoto, Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing, Honolulu, Hawaii; Archie T. Ikehara, Honolulu, Hawaii; Ward F.N. Fujimoto, Fujiyama, Duffy & Fujiyama, Honolulu, Hawaii; Mervyn M. Kotake, Matsubara, Lee & Kotake, Honolulu, Hawaii; Lono J. Lee, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendants-appellees/cross-appellants.

Before: FLETCHER, D.W. NELSON and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judge:

OVERVIEW

Plaintiffs Leonard Wong, et al., brought this action against Defendants Han Kuk Chun, Tetsuo Yasuda, Masanori Kobayashi, Yoshinori Hayashida, Y.Y. Valley Corporation ("YYVC"), Hiroshi Kobayashi, Eugene Lum, Norma Lum, and former Mayor Frank Fasi under the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68. Plaintiffs allege that the defendants violated § 1962(c), which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases