1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 928 P.2d
  5. 928 P.2d 463 (1996)
 

MILLAY v. CAM

No. 19063-0-II.

928 P.2d 463 (1996)

84 Wash.App. 369

Jack M. MILLAY, Appellant, v. Elena K. CAM and Raymond Blaisdell, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

December 30, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradley W. Andersen, Joseph L. Udall, Stevenson, for Respondents.

R. Bruce Dusterhoff, James D. Case, Case & Dusterhoff, Portland, OR, for Appellant.

BRIDGEWATER, Judge.

In this case, which concerns serial redemptions of real property, we are asked to decide whether a prospective redemptioner's declaratory action to dispute the "sum required" to redeem under RCW 6.23.080 is equal to tendering payment or tolls the statutory redemption period. We hold that, because the statute requires payment within a specified period, filing a declaratory action neither tolls the running of the period of redemption nor acts as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases