1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 930 F.Supp.
  5. 930 F.Supp. 451 (1996)
 

PATE v. COLUMBIA MACH., INC.

Civ. No. 94-0145-S-BLW.

930 F.Supp. 451 (1996)

Kenneth PATE and Corrine Pate, husband and wife, Plaintiffs, v. COLUMBIA MACHINE, INC., a Washington Corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Idaho.

February 15, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph M. Coughlan, Coughlan & Coughlan, Boise, ID, Richard S. Owen, Nampa, ID, for plaintiffs.

Hugh Mossman, Boise, ID, J. Kevin West, Hall Farley Oberrecht & Blanton, Boise, ID, John R. Potter, Stephen G. Leatham, Heurlin & Potter, Vancouver, WA, for defendant.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

WINMILL, District Judge.

The Court held a bench trial in this matter that concluded on January 11, 1996. After examining all the testimony and documents admitted into evidence at that trial, the Court enters the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a).

I.

FINDINGS OF FACT

A. The S32 Splitter.

1. The S32 Splitter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases