1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 935 F.Supp.
  5. 935 F.Supp. 443 (1996)
 

FONAR CORP. v. MAGNETIC RESONANCE PLUS, INC.

No. 93 Civ. 2220 (CBM).

935 F.Supp. 443 (1996)

FONAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MAGNETIC RESONANCE PLUS, INC., and Robert Domenick, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

August 2, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sullivan & Cromwell by Stuart Meiklejohn, Steven L. Holley, New York City, Shiff & Tisman by Laurence Shiff, New York City, Fonar Corporation by Scott Fields, Mineola, NY, for Plaintiff.

Coudert Brothers by Adam J. Safer, New York City, Klehr, Harrison, Harvey, Branzburg & Ellers by Lateef Mtima, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendants.

OPINION

MOTLEY, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

By Order dated March 27, 1996 (hereinafter "the March Order"), this court dismissed plaintiff's copyright and related state law claims for plaintiff's failure to describe its purportedly copyrighted computer software in such a way that would reveal the substance of the protected work. Subsequent to the March Order, defendants moved for costs, attorney's fees and sanctions related to defending...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases