SAMSUN CORP. v. KHOZESTAN MASHINE KAR CO.

No. 95 Civ. 3523 (CSH).

926 F.Supp. 436 (1996)

SAMSUN CORPORATION, as Owner of the Prabhu Daya, Petitioner, v. KHOZESTAN MASHINE KAR CO., as Charterer, Respondent.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

May 29, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Healy & Baillie, New York City (Jeremy J.O. Harwood, Richard V. Singleton, II, of counsel), for Petitioner.

Hill Rivkins Loesberg O'Brien Mulroy & Hayden, New York City, (Caspar F. Ewig, Alan S. Loesberg, T.E. Willoughby, of counsel), for Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HAIGHT, Senior District Judge:

This is a petition pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq, to compel arbitration of commercial disputes in New York. The respondent opposes the petition on the ground that the parties did not agree to New York arbitration. Subject matter jurisdiction in this Court arises out of the underlying maritime contract of charter party.

Background...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases