1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 923 F.Supp.
  5. 923 F.Supp. 433 (1996)
 

BARON PHILIPPE de ROTHSCHILD v. PARAMOUNT DIST.

No. 87 Civ. 6820 (SHS).

923 F.Supp. 433 (1996)

BARON PHILIPPE de ROTHSCHILD, S.A.; Societte Civile Chateau Lafite Rothschild; Guy de Rothschild; Eric de Rothschild; and Philippine de Rothschild, Plaintiffs, v. PARAMOUNT DISTILLERS, INC.; Paramount Brands, Inc.; Mar-Inter S.A.R.L.; and Roger L. Myers and Chantal Myers, d/b/a Monopoles Alfred Rothschild and Les Caves M.A.R., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

May 1, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christine Lepera, Gold Farrell & Marks, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Kenneth Umans, Colucci & Umans, New York City, for Defendants Roger & Chantal Myers, Mar-Inter

William R. Hansen, Nims, Howes, Collision, Hansen & Lackert, New York City, Christopher B. Fagan, Fay, Sharpe, Beall, Fagan, Minnich & McKee, Cleveland, Ohio, for Defendant Paramount.

OPINION

STEIN, District Judge.

Defendants Mar-Inter S.A.R.L., Roger L. Myers and Chantal Myers (the "Myers defendants") move to dismiss plaintiffs' amended complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue, to transfer this action to the Southern District of Florida or, alternatively, for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the Myers defendants' motion is denied.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Baron Phillippe...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases