RODRIGUEZ v. DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE

Docket No. A074922.

51 Cal.App.4th 1289 (1996)

GUSTAVO RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE, Defendant and Respondent; DORA ALVARENGA, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

December 26, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Arlo H. Smith for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Richard F. Finn and Paul D. Gifford, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.

Grant & Sternberg, Robert L. Grant and Heidi A. Coad-Hermelin for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.


OPINION

REARDON, J.

In this case, we hold that the Commissioner of the Department of Real Estate does not violate a real estate broker's due process rights by suspending the broker's license as an automatic consequence of granting a defrauded client's claim for payment from the department's client recovery account. Current legal requirements of notice to the broker and an opportunity to submit written argument challenging the claim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases