STATE v. MUNDEN

No. 35460-4-I.

913 P.2d 421 (1996)

81 Wash.App. 192

The STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Ruvin MUNDEN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

April 8, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric J. Nielsen, Nielsen & Acosta, Seattle, Mark W. Watanabe, Seattle, for Appellant.

Rod Scarr, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, King County Pros. Atty. Office, Seattle, for Respondent.


BECKER, Judge.

Ruvin Munden appeals his conviction of second degree burglary. The question is whether the trial court erred in permitting the jury to convict him as an accomplice when the State's evidence tended to show that he and two others accomplished the burglary as principals. Because the evidence did not exclude the possibility that he acted both as principal and accomplice, we affirm.

On May 19, 1994, at about 12:45 a.m., Munden was hanging around...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases