HOLLAND v. CITY OF CANNON BEACH

LUBA 95-049; CA A90660; SC S43010.

915 P.2d 407 (1996)

323 Or. 148

David HOLLAND, Respondent on Review, v. CITY OF CANNON BEACH, Petitioner on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided May 2, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Kearns, of Preston Gates & Ellis, Portland, filed the petition for petitioner on review.

No appearance contra.


PER CURIAM.

This is a land use case. The relevant procedural facts are as follows.

Holland filed an application with the City of Cannon Beach (the City) to develop an 11-lot residential subdivision. The City denied that application, based on Holland's failure to demonstrate compliance with five policies in the City's comprehensive plan.

Holland appealed that decision to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), raising four assignments of error. Each assignment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases