1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 96 F.3d
  5. 96 F.3d 1223 (1996)
 

U.S. v. HUBBARD

Nos. 95-10317, 95-10318.

96 F.3d 1223 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael David HUBBARD, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Ray LYON, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided September 23, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Caro Marks, Arthur W. Ruthenbeck, Assistant Federal Defenders, Sacramento, CA, for defendant-appellant Michael Hubbard.

Dwight M. Samuel, Sacramento, CA, for defendant-appellant James Lyon.

Jeffrey B. Chasnow (argued), Kenneth L. Jost, Peter Ainsworth, Angela Gunter (on the brief), United States Department of Justice, Office of Consumer Litigation, Washington, DC, for plaintiff-appellee United States.

Before WIGGINS and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and VANCE, District Judge.

TROTT, Circuit Judge:

OVERVIEW

Michael Hubbard and James Lyon were convicted of conspiracy to commit mail fraud related to an elaborate scheme of odometer tampering. They appeal the district court's denial of their Motion for Judgment of Acquittal, arguing (1) that there was insufficient evidence to support a charge of conspiracy, (2) that there was no "mailing" to bring their conduct within the mail fraud statute, (3) that there was no showing of specific...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases