1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 672 A.2d
  5. 672 A.2d 639 (1996)
 

BLONDELL v. BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPT.

No. 68, Sept. Term, 1995.

672 A.2d 639 (1996)

341 Md. 680

Charles R. BLONDELL v. BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Reconsideration Denied April 10, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Marshall (Schlachman, Belsky & Weiner, P.A., on brief), Baltimore, for petitioner.

Gary May, Assistant City Solicitor (Neal M. Janey, City Solicitor, on brief), Baltimore, for respondent.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, KARWACKI, BELL and RAKER, JJ.

RAKER, Judge.

In this case, we are asked to interpret §§ 727, 733, and 734A of the Law Enforcement Officers' Bill of Rights (LEOBR), which govern punishment for violations of police regulations.1 The question presented is whether the LEOBR prohibits the Police Department from adding new charges against an officer after the officer rejects the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases