FRIED v. SUNGARD RECOVERY SERVICES

Civil A. No. 95-878.

925 F.Supp. 375 (1996)

Sigmund FRIED, et al. v. SUNGARD RECOVERY SERVICES, et al.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

May 2, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark R. Cuker and Steven M. Schain, Williams & Cuker, Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiff.

Roger F. Cox, Blank, Rome, Comisky & McCauley, Philadelphia, PA and John P. McShea, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, Philadelphia, PA, for defendants.


MEMORANDUM

JOYNER, District Judge.

Defendant Intech Construction, Inc. moves this Court to grant it summary judgment on one claim and dismiss the other claims asserted against it in the Second Amended Complaint brought by Plaintiffs Sigmund Fried and Sam Wurst on behalf of themselves and a purported class. The facts of this case have been recited in previous decisions of this Court; similarly, many of the legal issues raised herein have been addressed before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases