1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 555 N.W.2d
  5. 555 N.W.2d 745 (1996)
 

CARLSON v. PANUSKA

No. CO-95-2531.

555 N.W.2d 745 (1996)

Alan G. CARLSON, et al., Petitioners, Appellants, v. Harold and Margaret PANUSKA, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Review Denied January 10, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Best & Flanagan, Robert L. Meller, Jr., Rider, Bennett, Egan & Arundel, Eric J. Magnuson, Minneapolis, for petitioners, appellants.

Briggs and Morgan, Margaret K. Savage, Janel E. LaBoda, Margo L. Coyle, Minneapolis, for respondents.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

This appeal arises out of the purchase of a parcel of real property located in Orono, Minnesota. Alan Carlson and Kingsbridge Properties, Inc. (Carlson) bought the property in 1989 from Dr. and Mrs. Harold Panuska (the Panuskas) with the intent of developing it into single-family homesites. Carlson filed a complaint in Hennepin County District Court on October 16, 1992, alleging several causes of action based on fraud in the sale of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases