POTTER v. KULONGOSKI

SC S42823.

910 P.2d 377 (1996)

322 Or. 575

John POTTER and David Fidanque, Petitioners, v. Theodore R. KULONGOSKI, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided February 8, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Tyner, III, Hillsboro, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioners.

Robert B. Rocklin, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the answering memorandum were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.


GRABER, Justice.

This is an original proceeding in which petitioners challenge the Attorney General's ballot title for a proposed initiative measure. Petitioners are electors who, in a timely manner and pursuant to ORS 250.067(1), submitted written comments about the Attorney General's draft ballot title. Accordingly, they are entitled to seek a different title in this court. ORS 250.085(2). We certify the Attorney General's ballot title to the Secretary of State...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases