1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 927 F.Supp.
  5. 927 F.Supp. 348 (1996)
 

OEHRLEINS & SONS & DAUGHTER v. HENNEPIN COUNTY

Civil No. 4-94-63.

927 F.Supp. 348 (1996)

BEN OEHRLEINS AND SONS AND DAUGHTER, INC. n/k/a Dakota Resource Recovery, Inc.; Dick's Sanitation; Elk River Landfill, Inc.; Gallagher's Service, Inc.; Knutson Services, Inc.; Randy's Sanitation, Inc.; Poor Richard's, Inc.; Vasko Rubbish Removal, Inc.; Wasteco, Inc.; Waste Systems Corp.; and Walters Recycling & Refuse Service, Plaintiffs, v. HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.

June 3, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven J. Wells, Robert Edward Cattanach, B. Andrew Brown, Alexandra B. Klass, Dorsey & Whitney, Minneapolis, MN, Timothy Robert Thornton, Raymond Scott Davies, Jack Young Perry, Briggs & Morgan, Minneapolis, MN, for Ben Oehrleins and Sons and Daughter, Inc.

Steven J. Wells, Robert Edward Cattanach, B. Andrew Brown, Alexandra B. Klass, Dorsey & Whitney, Minneapolis, MN, Timothy Robert Thornton, Jack Young Perry, Briggs & Morgan, Minneapolis, MN, for Dick's Sanitation, Elk River Landfill, Inc., Gallagher's Service, Inc., Knutson Services, Inc., Randy's Sanitation, Inc., Poor Richard's, Inc., Vasko Rubbish Removal, Inc., Wasteco, Inc., Waste Systems Corp.

Steven J. Wells, Robert Edward Cattanach, Alexandra B. Klass, Dorsey & Whitney, Minneapolis, MN, for Walters Recycling & Refuse Service.

Charles Nathan Nauen, Robert J. Schmit, William Allen Gengler, Schatz Paquin Lockridge Grindal & Holstein, Minneapolis, MN, Toni A. Beitz, Hennepin Cty. Attorney, Minneapolis, MN, Lon M. Erickson, Hennepin Cty. Attys. Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Hennepin County.

ORDER

DOTY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the motion of defendant Hennepin County, Minnesota ("Hennepin County") to stay enforcement of certain aspects of the permanent injunction entered in this action and to stay further proceedings pending appeal. Plaintiffs oppose these motions.

A. Stay of Permanent Injunction

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 62(c)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases