1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 918 F.Supp.
  5. 918 F.Supp. 353 (1996)
 

NEEDHAM v. WEDTECH (USA), INC.

No. 95-C-1211-C.

918 F.Supp. 353 (1996)

Donald NEEDHAM, an individual, and Neeco, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation, Plaintiffs, v. WEDTECH (USA), INC., a Delaware corporation, and Wedtech, Inc., a Canadian corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma.

March 19, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard B. Noulles, John H. Rule, and David E. Keglovits, Gable & Gotwals, Tulsa, OK, for plaintiffs.

Steven J. Adams and Mary C. Coulson, Gardere & Wynne, Tulsa, OK, for defendants.

ORDER

H. DALE COOK, Senior District Judge.

Currently pending before the Court is the motion filed by defendants seeking dismissal of the instant action for lack of jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the F.R.C.P. and 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

On December 11, 1995, plaintiffs filed the present action against defendants, invoking diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. On January 2, 1996, defendants filed motions to dismiss...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases