1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 929 P.2d
  5. 929 P.2d 336 (1996)
 

FONTANA v. STEENSON

9408-05767; CA A89770.

929 P.2d 336 (1996)

145 Or. App. 229

Ronald FONTANA, Appellant, v. Thomas M. STEENSON and Michael Schumann, Respondents, and Alice D. Ellis, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 11, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jess M. Glaeser, Portland, argued the cause, for appellant. On the briefs were Ronald A. Fontana and Ronald A. Fontana, P.C.

Peter H. Glade, Portland, argued the cause, for respondents. On the brief were Michael Schumann and Steenson, Schumann, Tewksbury, Later & Rose, P.C.

Before DEITS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and HASELTON, JJ.

HASELTON, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his claims for accountings of two partnerships and his claim for breach of contract. He argues that the trial court erred in concluding that defendants Steenson and Schumann1 made a prima facie showing of the defense of laches and that there were no genuine issues of material fact pertaining to that defense. ORCP 47. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases