FRIED v. SUNGARD RECOVERY SERVICES INC.

Civil Action No. 95-0878.

936 F.Supp. 310 (1996)

Sigmund FRIED, et. al. v. SUNGARD RECOVERY SERVICES INC. et. al.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

September 12, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark R. Cuker, Steven M. Schain, Williams & Cuker, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiffs.

Roger F. Cox, Kenneth N. Klass, Jordana Cooper, Blank, Rome, Comisky & McCauley, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendants: Sungard, Dibrino, and Mulholland.

John P. McShea, Victoria J. Clauss, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendant: Intech Corp.


MEMORANDUM

JOYNER, District Judge.

Today we address Defendant Intech Construction, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Counts VI and VII of Plaintiff Sigmund Fried's Second Amended Complaint. For the reasons that follow, we grant Defendant's Motion and order that Counts VI and VII be dismissed with prejudice.

BACKGROUND

This case concerns an alleged conspiracy to remove asbestos illegally from a building where Plaintiffs were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases