SCHUCK v. HABICHT

Nos. 94-2344 and 94-3223.

672 So.2d 559 (1996)

David SCHUCK and Sally Schuck, Appellants, v. Michael T. HABICHT, Maritime Insurance Group, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Compagnie Europeenne D'Assurances Industrielles S.A., and Compagnie D'Assurances Maritimes Aeriennes Et Terrestres, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied May 14, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ben J. Weaver of Weaver & Weaver, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Domingo C. Rodriguez of Rodriguez & Aronson, P.A., Miami, for appellees.


Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied May 14, 1996.

PARIENTE, Judge.

The issue in this appeal is whether appellants (plaintiffs) are entitled to bring a direct action as third-party beneficiaries of a marine insurance policy. This issue turns on whether the policy is interpreted to be an indemnity policy, as the trial court found, or whether it should be interpreted to be a liability policy. Because we find that the policy contains language and provisions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases