REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. COMM. ON STATE MANDATES

Docket No. D024360.

43 Cal.App.4th 1188 (1996)

51 Cal. Rptr.2d 100

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. COMMISSION ON STATE MANDATES, Defendant and Respondent; DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, Movant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

March 7, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Higgs, Fletcher & Mack, John M. Morris Kenneth H. Lounsbery and James A. Cunningham for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Gary D. Hori and Paula Higashi for Defendant and Respondent.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Robert L. Mukai, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Linda A. Cabatic and Daniel G. Stone, Deputy Attorneys General, for Movant and Appellant.


OPINION

HUFFMAN, J.

The State of California Department of Finance (DOF) appeals the order of the superior court denying its motion to intervene as an indispensable party in administrative mandamus proceedings brought by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Marcos (San Marcos) against the State of California Commission on State Mandates (the Commission). In those mandamus proceedings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases