U.S. v. ANNIGONI

No. 94-50422.

96 F.3d 1132 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard ANNIGONI, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed June 8, 1995.

Amended September 21, 1995.

Order Granting Rehearing January 10, 1996.

Argued and Submitted March 21, 1996.

Decided September 23, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Tanaka, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellant.

Miriam A. Krinsky and Daniel P. Collins, Assistant United States Attorneys, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: HUG, Chief Judge, and FLETCHER, POOLE, BEEZER, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, THOMPSON, LEAVY, T. G. NELSON, KLEINFELD, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.


Order Granting Rehearing En Banc January 10, 1996.

Opinion by Judge HAWKINS; Dissent by Judge LEAVY; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI.

MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:

This case asks us to reconsider the long-standing principle that automatic reversal of a conviction is the proper remedy where a trial court erroneously deprives a criminal defendant of the right of peremptory challenge.

Following a jury trial, defendant-appellant Richard Annigoni...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases