EAST RIVER SAV. BANK v. CURTIS


229 A.D.2d 999 (1996)

645 N.Y.S.2d 119

East River Savings Bank, Respondent, v. Glorine D. Curtis et al., Defendants, and Mundaca Investment Corporation, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

July 12, 1996


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Mundaca Investment Corporation (defendant), a subordinate mortgagee on property sold in foreclosure, contends that Supreme Court erred in denying its motion to vacate the sale on the ground that plaintiff, the senior mortgagee, failed to notify defendant of the sale as required by law (see, Shaw v Russell, 95 A.D.2d 977, affd 60 N...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases