ST. ANDREWS PUBLIC SERV. DIST. v. MOSELEY

No. 24476.

475 S.E.2d 750 (1996)

ST. ANDREWS PUBLIC SERVICE DITRICT, on behalf of itself and as representative of all Bondholders of St. Andrews Public Service District Outstanding General Obligation Bonds; Mrs. Ethel G. Bonner, a Bondholder of St. Andrews Public Service District General Obligation Bonds, dated as of August 1, 1985, and June 1, 1992, on behalf of herself and as representative of all similarly situated bondholders who hold outstanding St. Andrews Public Service District General Obligation bonds and, as a taxpayer residing in the St. Andrews Public Service District whose property has not yet been annexed into the City of Charleston, on behalf of herself and all other taxpayers similarly situated, Appellants, v. Peggy MOSELEY, Auditor of Charleston County in her official capacity, W.O. Thomas, Jr., Treasurer of Charleston County in his official capacity, and the City of Charleston, South Carolina, Respondents.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided August 12, 1996.

Rehearing Denied September 19, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo H. Hill, Hill, Wyatt, Bannister & Brown, Greenville; and Richard B. Watson, Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough, Charleston, for appellants.

Frances I. Cantwell, Assistant Corporation Counsel, Charleston, for respondent City of Charleston.

A. Arthur Rosenblum, County Attorney, Charleston, for respondents Moseley and Thomas.


WALLER, Associate Justice.

On appeal is an order of the Master-in-Equity denying appellants' petition for a writ of mandamus to require Respondents, the auditor and treasurer of Charleston County, to levy taxes on certain properties annexed from the St. Andrews Public Service District (District) into the city of Charleston (City). We affirm.

FACTS

District was created in 1949 to operate water and sewer systems and furnish fire protection facilities...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases