PER CURIAM.
Appellant, charged with dealing in stolen property, was placed on probation and argues that the trial court erred in requiring him to submit to random breath and blood testing at his own expense, because it is not reasonably related to the crime. We strike only the portion of the condition requiring the appellant to bear the costs of random testing because it was not orally pronounced. See Fernandez v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.