Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant to suppress his statements to the police and the physical evidence seized as a result of those statements. "[E]ven assuming, arguendo, that the police deliberately failed to obtain an arrest warrant before speaking to defendant in order to avoid the attachment of defendant's right to counsel, that failure would not require...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
