NICHOLS v. MID-CONTINENT PIPE LINE CO.

No. 84130.

933 P.2d 272 (1996)

Terry NICHOLS, Doneta Nichols, Terry Brett Nichols, Quinton Dale Nichols, and Tyler Danton Wayne Kauk, a minor, by and through his father and next friend, Tony Edwin Kauk, Appellants (Counter-Appellees)/Plaintiffs, v. MID-CONTINENT PIPE LINE COMPANY, Appellee (Counter-Appellant)/Defendant.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Rehearing Denied December 19, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allan DeVore and Marjorie Ramana, The DeVore Law Firm, Oklahoma City, Douglas E. Burns, Oklahoma City, for appellants.

Jessie V. Pilgrim, Tulsa, for appellees.


OPALA, Justice.

The issues presented on certiorari are: (1) Are the plaintiffs within the class of claimants who may maintain a common-law action to recover on a nuisance theory? (2) Was it an abuse of discretion for the trial court to admit evidence about the plaintiff's medical condition? (3) Was it reversible error to admit, during the punitive-damages stage of the trial, evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases