1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 927 F.Supp.
  5. 927 F.Supp. 273 (1996)
 

IN RE AMINO ACID LYSINE ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Nos. 95 C 7679, 96 C 2699. MDL No. 1083.

927 F.Supp. 273 (1996)

In re AMINO ACID LYSINE ANTITRUST LITIGATION. FEEDSTUFFS PROCESSING CO., etc., Plaintiff, v. ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND CO., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

May 7, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey J. Parish of Rosenblum, Parish & Isaacs and John H. Boone, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff.

Aubrey M. Daniel, III and John E. Schmidtlein of Williams & Connolly, Washington, DC and Robert S. Brewer, Jr. of McKenna & Cuneo, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

This is the fourth tagalong action in this MDL litigation that has required this Court to deal with a motion to remand a previously-removed state court lawsuit.1 Archer Daniels Midland Co. ("Archer") and its codefendants2 originally removed the action from the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Francisco...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases