1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 937 F.Supp.
  5. 937 F.Supp. 255 (1996)
 

GRIMMER v. LORD DAY & LORD

No. 94 Civ. 8795 (MGC).

937 F.Supp. 255 (1996)

John E. GRIMMER, Jean-Pierre Van Lent, Claudia M. Isaacs and Delores Fiordaliso, Plaintiffs, v. LORD DAY & LORD, Barrett Smith, and Lord Day & Lord, Barrett Smith Employee Benefit Plan, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

August 28, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schoeman, Marsh & Updike, LLP by Michael E. Schoeman, New York City, for Plaintiffs.

Jackson, Lewis, Schnitzler & Krupman by Elise M. Bloom, Gregory I. Rasin, Miriam Lieberson, New York City, for Defendants.

OPINION

CEDARBAUM, District Judge.

This is a class action under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2101 (the "WARN Act") by employees of the former law firm Lord Day & Lord, Barrett Smith. Plaintiffs claim that Lord Day violated the WARN Act by closing its offices without giving notice to its employees sixty days in advance as required by the statute. Lord Day's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases