Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted that part of defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action. Plaintiff's slide down an embankment is not the type of hazard that Labor Law § 240 (1) was designed to protect against (see, Williams v White Haven Mem. Park,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
DOTY v. EASTMAN KODAK CO.
229 A.D.2d 961 (1996)
646 N.Y.S.2d 474
Rebecca T. Doty, Appellant-Respondent, v. Eastman Kodak Company et al., Respondents-Appellants
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 12, 1996
July 12, 1996
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.