1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 953 F.Supp.
  5. 953 F.Supp. 232 (1996)
 

HANLEY v. TRENDWAY CORP.

No. 94 C 5406.

953 F.Supp. 232 (1996)

Christopher HANLEY, Plaintiff, v. TRENDWAY CORPORATION, a Michigan Corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

December 26, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Lee, Tomes, Lee & Dvorak, Chicago, IL, for Christopher Hanley.

Fred E. Schulz, Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon, Chicago, IL, for Trendway Corp.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NORDBERG, District Judge.

Plaintiff Christopher Hanley ("Hanley") brings this action to recover sales commissions allegedly owed him by Defendant Trendway Corporation ("Trendway"). Hanley's Amended Complaint alleges three theories of recovery: contract, restitution, and interference with prospective advantage. The Court previously dismissed all but the contract claim. Before the Court are Motions for Summary Judgment from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases