1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 942 F.Supp.
  5. 942 F.Supp. 235 (1996)
 

BARTON & PITTINOS, INC. v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP.

Civil Action No. 95-6619.

942 F.Supp. 235 (1996)

BARTON & PITTINOS, INC., Plaintiff, v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

September 30, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nicole D. Galli, Philip H. Lebowitz, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff.

James D. Coleman, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendant.

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM

KATZ, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 30th day of Sept., 1996, upon consideration of defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment, the response thereto, the accompanying legal memoranda, and a hearing, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is GRANTED as to Count I of the complaint, and that Counts II, III, and IV...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases