1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 76 Ohio
  5. 76 Ohio St.3d 41 (1996)
 

CUERVO v. CINCINNATI INS. CO.

No. 94-2404.

76 Ohio St.3d 41 (1996)

CUERVO ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 3, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Isaac, Brant, Ledman & Teetor, Charles E. Brant and Terri B. Gregori, for appellees.

Lane, Alton & Horst and Karen Krisher Rosenberg, for appellant.

MOYER, C.J.

Cincinnati Insurance Company has abandoned its argument below that the Cuervos could only use the supplemental petition procedures established by R.C. 3929.06 to collect the amounts awarded to them from Cincinnati, the Snells' insurer. Without expressing any opinion concerning the merits of that argument, and without condoning the procedure used by the Cuervos in filing a new, separate action, rather than filing a supplemental petition in the action brought...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases