1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 936 S.W.2d
  5. 936 S.W.2d 238 (1996)
 

ECHOLS v. FREDMAN

No. 70355.

936 S.W.2d 238 (1996)

Antoine ECHOLS, Sr., Appellant, v. Mark S. FREDMAN, Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

December 17, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Antoine Echols, Sr., Lewisburg, PA, pro se.

Edward S. Meyer, Jill K. Luft, Mark S. Fredman, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Antoine Echols appeals from the dismissal of his legal malpractice claim for failure to state a cause of action against Mark S. Fredman. Fredman complains that Echols' pro se brief fails to comply with the requirements of Rule 84.04 in that the points relied on in the briefs are vague and do not identify wherein and why the trial court erred, and further, the brief did not contain a fair and concise statement of the relevant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases