CASIO, INC. v. U.S.

Nos. 95-1099, 95-1111.

73 F.3d 1095 (1996)

CASIO, INC., Plaintiff/Cross-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

January 16, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven P. Florsheim, Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz & Silverman, LLP, New York City, argued for plaintiff/cross-appellant.

Susan Burnett Mansfield, Department of Justice, New York City, argued for defendant-appellant. Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director, Joseph I. Liebman, Attorney in Charge, International Trade Field Office and John J. Mahon, Attorney, Department of Justice, Commercial Litigation Branch, New York City, were on the brief for defendant-appellant. Also on the brief was Sheryl A. French, Office of Assistant Chief Counsel, International Trade Litigation, U.S. Customs Service, New York City, of counsel.

Before ARCHER, Chief Judge, MICHEL and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.


MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

The United States appeals the decision of the United States Court of International Trade, No. 89-07-00385, reclassifying 5 of 38 electronic musical synthesizer models, imported by Casio, Inc. ("Casio"), as "electrical articles which produce sound," Tariff Schedules of the United States ("TSUS")1 688.34, as opposed to their original classification as "electronic musical instruments," TSUS 725.47. Casio cross-appeals...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases