DOE v. JUDICIAL CONDUCT COMMN


169 Misc.2d 997 (1996)

647 N.Y.S.2d 420

In the Matter of John Doe, Petitioner, v. Commission On Judicial Conduct, Respondent.

Supreme Court, New York County.

August 16, 1996


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Godosky & Gentile, New York City, for petitioner. Gerald Stern, New York City, for respondent.


EDWARD H. LEHNER, J.

The issues before me in this CPLR article 78 proceeding are: (i) whether the determination of the respondent Commission on Judicial Conduct (the Commission) was valid in view of the fact that one of the six members (the minimum number needed for Commission action) who orally voted for the sanction of "admonition" at a March meeting of the Commission was no longer a member when the majority...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases