1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 910 F.Supp.
  5. 910 F.Supp. 249 (1996)
 

HEALEY v. HEALEY

No. 93-95-CIV-3-BR.

910 F.Supp. 249 (1996)

Francis W. HEALEY, Plaintiff, v. Doris G. HEALEY, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division.

January 10, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack Edmund Carter, Fayetteville, NC, for Francis W. Healey.

Felix Thomas Holt, III, Beaver, Holt, Richardson, Sternlicht, Burge & Glazier, P.A., Fayetteville, NC, for Doris G. Healey.

Doris G. Healey, Highland Park, NJ, pro se.

ORDER

BRITT, District Judge.

Before the court are the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. Defendant has also requested that the court order a hearing on this matter. The court finds a hearing in this matter is not necessary as the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court, thus defendant's request for oral argument is DENIED. This matter is now ripe for disposition.

I. FACTS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases