1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 557 N.W.2d
  5. 557 N.W.2d 601 (1996)
 

STATE v. LINDHOLM

No. C7-96-611.

557 N.W.2d 601 (1996)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Tim LINDHOLM, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied February 26, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Attorney General, St. Paul, for Respondent.

Rolf A. Sponheim, Assistant City Attorney, City of Minnetonka, Minnetonka, for Respondent.

Brian R. Salita, Law Office of Brian R. Salita, Edina, for Appellant.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, P.J., TOUSSAINT, C.J., and FOLEY, J.

OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge.

Appellant Tim Lindholm contends that Minn.Stat. § 326.01, subd. 9 (1996), requiring apprentice plumbers to work under the "immediate and personal supervision" of a licensed journeyman or master plumber, does not require that the master or journeyman plumber be physically present at the job site.

FACTS

Appellant was convicted of aiding, advising, hiring...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases