Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum:
We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court, Howe, J. We add only that, pursuant to the terms of the policies at issue here, the intentional acts of plaintiff's employee do not deprive plaintiff of coverage (see, Morgan v Greater N. Y. Tax Payers Mut. Ins. Assn.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.