1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 228 A.D.2d
  5. 228 A.D.2d 915 (1996)
 

FRUTIGER v. HAMILTON CENT. SCH. DIST.

228 A.D.2d 915 (1996)

644 N.Y.S.2d 582

Theodore Frutiger et al., Individually and on Behalf of Amy Frutiger, a Handicapped Child, Appellants, v. Hamilton Central School District, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

June 20, 1996

Mikoll, J.

This appeal challenges Supreme Court's determination that plaintiffs' claims are barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel, based on the court's determination that plaintiffs had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the claims previously and that the matter was disposed of on the merits. Plaintiffs commenced an action in United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (hereinafter the Federal action) on their behalf...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases